Views
The two sides of the abortion debate
Pro-choice
Pro-choice beliefs are grounded in the idea that women have the right to make their own decisions about their bodies and their health. Pro-choice advocates argue that reproductive freedom is a fundamental human right, and that women should be able to access safe and legal abortion services if they choose to do so. This includes the right to choose whether or not to continue a pregnancy, as well as the right to access contraception and other reproductive healthcare services.
Pro-choice advocates also argue that restricting access to abortion can have negative consequences for women’s health and well-being. When women are unable to access safe and legal abortion services, they may resort to unsafe and potentially life-threatening methods of terminating a pregnancy. In addition, pro-choice advocates argue that denying women the ability to make decisions about their own bodies and reproductive health can have negative social and economic consequences, such as limiting their educational and employment opportunities.
Pro-choice advocates also emphasise the importance of respecting women’s choices and their autonomy. They argue that women are best equipped to make decisions about their own lives, and that they should be trusted to make informed decisions about their reproductive health. Pro-choice advocates believe that women should not be shamed or stigmatised for choosing to have an abortion, and that they should have access to comprehensive reproductive healthcare services that include information and support for all pregnancy options.
Pro-life
Pro-life beliefs centre around the idea that human life begins at conception and that all human life is valuable and should be protected. Pro-life advocates believe that abortion is the taking of an innocent human life, and therefore is morally wrong and should be prohibited by law. They argue that the right to life is a fundamental human right that should be protected by society, and that unborn children have the same right to life as born children.
Pro-life advocates often emphasise the potential of an unborn child, and the value of the potential life that is lost through abortion. They argue that every human life is valuable and should be protected, regardless of the circumstances of their conception or their physical or mental condition. Pro-life advocates also argue that there are alternative options for women who face unplanned pregnancies, such as adoption or parenting, that allow for the protection of the unborn child while also respecting the rights and needs of the mother.
In addition to moral and ethical arguments, pro-life advocates often point to scientific and medical evidence to support their position. They argue that advancements in medical technology have shown that unborn children have the capacity to feel pain and respond to stimuli, and that they are distinct and separate human beings from their mothers. Pro-life advocates also point to studies that suggest that abortion can have negative physical and mental health consequences for women, and that it can lead to an increased risk of future pregnancy complications.
The link between pro-life beliefs and religion, particularly Christianity, is deeply rooted in the belief that human life is a sacred gift from God. Many religious texts, including the Bible, emphasise the sanctity of human life and the inherent value of every individual. Christians, in particular, often point to the Ten Commandments, which includes the commandment “Thou shalt not kill,” as evidence that life should be protected from conception to natural death. Not all pro-life individuals are religious, and not all religious individuals are pro-life. Pro-life beliefs can also be influenced by philosophical, ethical, or moral considerations, which may not necessarily be rooted in religion.